IELTS Reading Test Academic 263 – Can we call it“Art”? (2)
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-14 which are based on IELTS Reading Test Academic 263 – Can we call it“Art”? (2) Reading Passage Below:-
Can we call it“Art”? (2)
Life-Casting and Art
Julian Bames explores the questions posed by Life-Casts, an exhibition of plaster moulds of living people and objects which were originally used for scientific purposes
{A} Art changes over time and our idea of what art is changing too. For example, objects originally intended for devotional, ritualistic or recreational purposes may be recategorized as art by members of other later civilizations, such as our own, which no longer respond to these purposes.
{B} What also happens is that techniques and crafts which would have been judged inartistic at the time they were used are reassessed. Life-casting is an interesting example of this. It involved making a plaster mould of a living person or thing. This was complex, technical work, as Benjamin Robert Haydon discovered when he poured 250 litres of plaster over his human model and nearly killed him. At the time, the casts were used for medical research and, consequently, in the nineteenth-century life-casting was considered inferior to sculpture in the same way that, more recently, photography was thought to be a lesser art than painting. Both were viewed as unacceptable shortcuts by the ‘senior l arts. Their virtues of speed and unwavering realism also implied their limitations; they left little or no room for the imagination.
{C} For many, life-casting was an insult to the sculptor’s creative genius. In an infamous lawsuit of 1834, a moulder whose mask of the dying French emperor Napoleon had been reproduced and sold without his permission was judged to have no rights to the image. In other words, he was specifically held not to be an artist. This judgment reflects the view of established members of the nineteenth-century art world such as Rodin, who commented that life-casting “happens fast but it doesn’t make Art’. Some even feared that ‘if too much nature was allowed in, it would lead Art away from its proper course of the Ideal.
{D} The painter Gauguin, at the end of the nineteenth century, worried about future developments in photography. If ever the process went into colour, what painter would labor away at a likeness with a brush made from squirrel-tail? But painting has proved robust. Photography has changed it, of course, just as the novel had to reassess the narrative after the arrival of the cinema. But the gap between the senior and junior arts was always narrower than the traditionalists implied. Painters have always used technical backups such as studio assistants to do the boring bits, while apparently lesser crafts involve great skill, thought, preparation, and, depending on how we define it, imagination.
{E} Time changes our view in another way, too. Each new movement implies a reassessment of what has gone before. What is done now alters what was done before. In some cases, this is merely self-serving, with the new art using the old to justify itself. It seems to be saying, look at how all of that points to this! Aren’t we clever to be the culmination of all that has gone before? But usually, it is a matter of re-alerting the sensibility, reminding us not to take things for granted. Take, for example, the cast of the hand of a giant from a circus, made by an anonymous artist around 1889, an item that would now sit happily in any commercial or public gallery. The most significant impact of this piece is on the eye, in the contradiction between unexpected size and verisimilitude. Next, the human element kicks in. you note that the nails are dirt-encrusted, unless this is the caster’s decorative addition, and the fingertips extend far beyond them. Then you take in the element of choice, arrangement, art if you like, in the neat, pleated, buttoned sleeve-end that gives the item balance and variation of texture. This is just a moulded hand, yet the part stands utterly for the whole. It reminds us slyly, poignantly, of the full-size original.
{F} But is it art? And, if so, why? These are old tediously repeated questions to which artists have often responded, ‘It is art because I am an artist and therefore what I do is art. However, what doesn’t work for literature works much better for artworks of art do float free of their creators’ intentions. Over time the “reader” does become more powerful. Few of us can look at a medieval altarpiece as its painter intended. We believe too little and aesthetically know too much, so we recreate and find new fields of pleasure in the work. Equally, the lack of artistic intention of Paul Richer and other forgotten craftsmen who brushed oil onto flesh, who moulded, cast and decorated in the nineteenth century is now irrelevant. What counts is the surviving object and our response to it. The tests are simple: does it interest the eye, excite the brain, move the mind to reflection and involve the heart. It may, to use the old dichotomy, be beautiful but it is rarely true to any significant depth. One of the constant pleasures of art is its ability to come at us from an unexpected angle and stop us short in wonder.
Questions 1-5
Reading Passage 2 has six paragraphs, A-F.
Which paragraph contains the following information?
Write the correct letter, A-F, in boxes 14-18 on your answer sheet.
Question 1:- an example of a craftsman’s unsuccessful claim to ownership of his work
Question 2:-an example of how trends in the art can change attitudes to an earlier work
Question 3:-the original function of a particular type of art
Question 4:-ways of assessing whether or not an object is an art
Question 5:-how artists deal with the less interesting aspects of their work
Questions 6-11
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 2?
In boxes 19-24 on your answer sheet, write
| YES | if the statement agrees with the writer |
| NO | if the statement does not agree with the writer |
| NOT GIVEN | if there is no information about this in the passage |
Question 6:- Nineteenth-century sculptors admired the speed and realism of life-casting.
Question 7:-Rodin believed the quality of life-casting would improve if a slower process were used.
Question 8:-The importance of painting has decreased with the development of color photography.
Question 9:-Life-casting requires more skill than sculpture does.
Question 10:-New art encourages us to look at earlier work in a fresh way.
Question 11:-The intended meaning of a work of art can get lost over time.
Questions 12-13
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C, or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes 12 and 13 on your answer sheet.
Question 12:- The most noticeable contrast in the cast of the giant’s hand is between the
(A) dirt and decoration
(B) size and realism
(C) choice and arrangement
(D) balance and texture
Question 13:- According to the writer, the importance of any artistic object lies in
(A) the artist’s intentions
(B) the artist’s beliefs
(C) the relevance it has to modern life
(D) the way we respond to it
Answers IELTS Reading Test Academic 263 – Can we call it“Art”? (2)
| 1 | C | 8 | NO |
| 2 | E | 9 | NOT GIVEN |
| 3 | B | 10 | NO |
| 4 | F | 11 | YES |
| 5 | D | 12 | B |
| 6 | NO | 13 | D |
| 7 | NO |