Solving Environmental Problems Should Be the Responsibility of An International Organization Rather than Each National Government. Do You Agree or Disagree?
Irrefutable these days, environmental issues have become a major concern among individuals, owing to which it will generally argue whether mitigating environmental problems is the responsibility of local authorities. It not only saves time and money for the nation but also benefits individuals and national development.
There are many reasons why solving environmental problems is beneficial for the national government; first and foremost, it saves time and money. It is because, nowadays, deforestation is a pressing concern among individuals. If lawmakers solve this issue rather than international organisations, then it is fruitful for the nation’s development as it preserves time and money. Besides this, Take Canada as an epitome, which showed despite various demerits, the local regime mitigates the issue of deforestation. It is beneficial for the nation as it saves time and ample capital. Consequently, it is constructive development and drastically improves everyone’s life.
Moving further, another merit of resolving the issues through local regimes is that it benefits the nations and individuals. It reduces resource waste, which is a justified boon for breakthroughs in the country. In addition, it is also fruitful for individual holistic development; therefore, it promotes economic development, which creates more recruitment for youngsters. For instance, to develop more jobs in a nation, solving environmental problems is imperative for the national government instead of foreign lawmakers. As a result, it is a positive development for the nation.
Follow Us On IELTSData Facebook Page For More Updates
Having concluded, although local government lacks manpower, it saves time and money and improves individual lives to create jobs.
