Some Countries Have Legal Ages at Which People Can Drink. Other Countries Believe Not Having Strict Laws Is a Better Policy. Discuss Both Sides and Give Your Own Opinion.
Sample 1: Some Countries Have Legal Ages at Which People Can Drink
To commence, having an age limit for buying addictive products helps in reducing crimes as well as reducing the addiction that is spreading in younger age people. To elaborate, nowadays, children below 18 start taking alcohol, whisky, and drugs because of the easy availability from shops, owing to which they become addicted and commit some crimes to earn money to buy them again.
For example, a survey conducted in the Department of Police in India in 2018 revealed that around 45% of crimes are committed by those who are underage and are addicted to drinking alcoholic products and taking drugs. Thus, setting an age of buying helps reduce such criminal cases and helps to reduce addiction.
Also, Read Some People Believe that Childhood Is the Best Stage of Happiness
Furthermore, not having any strict laws increases criminal activities and puts the youth of the nation in danger. To illustrate, not having any strict law enables the dealer to supply drugs to children who are under minor age, and anyone can easily mold their minds and use them as a weapon to commit crimes such as murder, kidnapping as well as raise the mortality rate due to overconsumption of such things. For example, a headline was printed in the ‘Time Primes that around 55 percent died due to the over-utilization of toxic products. So, it is important to have a law and set an age limit for drinkers.
To sum up, having an age limit for drinking alcohol reduces the crime rate as well as minimizes the chances of morality rate because of over usage of alcohol, and I also believe that it is important to implement strict laws.
Sample 2: Some Countries Have Legal Ages at Which People Can Drink
Consumption of alcoholic beverages poses a great danger to a country’s economic growth, as well as both the psychological and the physical well-being of the citizens, and most countries try to curb this behavior by regulating the age at which an individual can drink alcohol. However, many countries advocate for having laws that do not restrict children from drinking.
Firstly, enacting laws that seek to restrict children from alcohol consumption is a step in the right direction. Children are at higher risk of engaging in irresponsible behaviors, and as such, they need some limitations on their freedom to enable them to function well in their society. When children are drunk, they can be violent, and this will expose them to the danger of being harmed by themselves or by others. For example, children who drink alcohol often report to the hospital with complaints of an accident resulting from reckless driving in Ghana.
Secondly, alcohol has a detrimental effect on the health of those who consume it, and as such, when children are exposed to it at a tender age, it results in poor academic performance in school, liver problems, diabetes, and hypertension. Making laws that restrict children from drinking could enable them to live a healthy lifestyle and grow healthy. In effect, the state saves funds that could have been used for health care expenditure. For example, people who reported to the hospital with complaints of diabetes or hypertension had a history of alcohol consumption at an early age.
On the other hand, some people also believe that irrespective of age, you have the right to decide for yourself. Hence, people should not be restricted from taking alcohol but rather should be provided with the necessary information required to make an informed decision.
In conclusion, states should put in place laws that will restrict people or children from drinking until they attain certain. This will enable them to have a healthy development, a healthy population, and a healthy country.
